For Plaintiffs Firms, In-House Counsel & Businesses With Active Litigation
Working alongside existing counsel on dismissal motions, discovery disputes, summary judgment, and appeals. Same standard of representation, fundamentally different cost structure.
A short overview from Alec on how the engagement works.
A direct call with Alec. See if there's a fit for co-counsel briefing on your active matters.
Currently retained by top-tier plaintiffs firms on active matters. Founded by an Ivy League trained Penn Law lawyer building one of the first AI-native complex litigation practices in the country.
Apply For Litigation Support
Tell Alec how you'd describe your side of the matter, leave your details, and pick a time. He reviews every response personally before the call.
This tells Alec how the engagement would be structured on your side.
He reviews every response personally before the call.
Your responses are with Alec. The next step is choosing a time for your Litigation Strategy Session, fifteen to twenty minutes, direct with him.
Choose Your TimeSubmitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The practice is calibrated around firms and businesses with active complex litigation, where existing counsel remains in place. Outside those situations, an engagement wouldn’t serve you well, and Alec would rather say so than take the call.
Nothing here is legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created.
Complex litigation has always run on substantial briefing. Dismissal motions, discovery disputes, summary judgment, appeals. That work has historically required teams of attorneys billing hundreds of hours per document, which is why litigation costs what it does.
That structure was necessary because volume and complexity demanded it. It isn't anymore. AI-augmented drafting has reached a point where a licensed lawyer using structured legal knowledge bases and multi-stage review can produce high-caliber work product at a fraction of the traditional throughput. Within the co-counsel structure, where existing lead counsel supervises and finalizes, the work product meets the same standard it always did. The cost structure fundamentally changes.
Most firms and businesses are still paying for a structure built for a different era. Bionic Law is designed for the ones ready to operate differently.
Fee figures are deliberately omitted. Pricing is quoted per brief once the matter and document type are known, on the Litigation Strategy Session.
Client Profiles
For firms handling complex litigation on contingency where attorneys’ time locked up in substantial briefing represents capital fronted against verdicts eighteen months out. Bionic Law frees that capital by producing your briefing as high-caliber work product on a flat fee. Your senior lawyers stay focused on strategy and the courtroom. Your firm carries more cases without diluting quality, and stronger work product may improve settlement leverage and case values.
For businesses paying six or seven figures annually to outside counsel where most of that spend is going to substantial briefing. Bionic Law works alongside your existing outside counsel to reduce briefing costs without disrupting the relationships you've built. Your lead counsel keeps supervising and finalizing. Your legal budget stretches meaningfully further.
For in-house counsel responsible for outside litigation budgets who need structural leverage on outside spend. Bionic Law changes the CFO conversation about why litigations cost what they cost: equal or better representation, secured far more cost effectively and on more favorable engagement terms. That holds for a single expensive complex litigation and for a routine annual litigation spend alike. You preserve your firm relationships throughout.
The Process
Bionic Law's briefing runs through a five-stage process that concentrates lawyer attention on the stages where judgment matters most, while using AI-augmented workflows to compress the mechanical extraction and structuring that used to require teams of attorneys.
Distilling relevant factual content from case materials, extracting applicable legal principles, and outlining key arguments.
AI-augmented drafting using specialized legal knowledge bases and custom prompting frameworks tailored to the specific document type.
Every section reviewed and enhanced for argumentation quality, framing, strategic advocacy, and persuasive structure, including citations and the characterization of law and facts.
A licensed attorney performs strategic editing, restructuring where the argument calls for it and adding rhetorical polish, key strategic touches, and hidden argumentative edges.
A final verification pass against attorney work-product standards and professional responsibility requirements. Available as part of the engagement where the matter calls for it.
Demonstrative
Select a document type and step through the process. Content is illustrative only; no client matter is depicted.
The Symbiosis Model
Bionic Law is structured as co-counsel or lawyer-to-lawyer services. Your existing outside counsel remains lead counsel on your matters. They continue supervising the work. They continue owning the client relationship. They continue finalizing everything before it reaches the client, opposing counsel, or the court.
What changes is where the drafting work comes from and what it costs. The substantial briefing that historically required a pyramid of associates billing hundreds of hours per document is now produced by Bionic Law at a flat fee. Their team stays focused on strategy, courtroom advocacy, communications with opposing counsel, and the relationship work that determines case outcomes.
Same team. Same client relationships. Fundamentally different cost structure.
The Founder
Ivy League trained Penn Law lawyer. Experience in complex litigation at major plaintiffs’ firms. Federal court chambers experience. Led an AI implementation at the American Arbitration Association’s Office of the CEO.
Founded Bionic Law to build one of the first AI-native complex litigation practices in the country from day one. Not a traditional firm bolting AI onto an existing model. A firm structured natively around the new production capability, with the professional responsibility infrastructure to serve complex litigation clients safely.
“The standard of the work was never the problem. The cost of producing it was. I built this firm so that clients stop paying for a structure the work no longer requires.”
Regulatory Structure
Bionic Law engagements are structured as co-counsel representations or lawyer-to-lawyer independent contracting services. Existing lead counsel remains in place, and Bionic Law performs work under lead counsel’s supervision.
Bionic Law is licensed to practice law in California. For matters involving other jurisdictions, Bionic Law may be able to practice under supervision of local counsel and/or as per local rules involving pro hac vice admission.
This engagement structure ensures that the dramatic efficiency gains made available by Bionic Law are delivered so as to meet or exceed the high standards of experienced lead counsel already in place.
Commitments
If your lead counsel doesn't approve the work quality, you pay nothing. The engagement ends professionally, no obligation to continue.
Every engagement includes contractually obligated delivery timelines, agreed before work begins and held to.
Flat fees are set competitively, generally targeting in the ballpark of fifty percent savings against a comparable hourly engagement.
The Litigation Strategy Session is a fifteen to twenty minute direct call with Alec. He'll review your qualification responses in advance and come prepared with context on your specific situation. On the call, you'll discuss whether Bionic Law fits your active matters and how the engagement would work if there's alignment.
Book a Litigation Strategy Session